<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Networking issues resolved</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2006/12/14/networking-issues-resolved/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2006/12/14/networking-issues-resolved/</link>
	<description>Information about DreamHost Services</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bahamut</title>
		<link>http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2006/12/14/networking-issues-resolved/#comment-72778</link>
		<dc:creator>Bahamut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 05:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2006/12/14/networking-issues-resolved/#comment-72778</guid>
		<description>Thanks you dreamhost for the great work done. Dreamhost Rocks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks you dreamhost for the great work done. Dreamhost Rocks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Silly</title>
		<link>http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2006/12/14/networking-issues-resolved/#comment-9347</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Silly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 04:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2006/12/14/networking-issues-resolved/#comment-9347</guid>
		<description>Why do you people that really need your web sites up bother with dirt cheap web hosting.  There are a lot of very fast, stable, and helpful companies out there, and instead you still feed dreamhost and then bitch when things don't work day in and day out.  Just makes no sense.  I watched people today spend $12 on two large, 2 extra shot mochas from a local coffee shop, and you guys are expecting world class uptime for $8/month?  Get real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you people that really need your web sites up bother with dirt cheap web hosting.  There are a lot of very fast, stable, and helpful companies out there, and instead you still feed dreamhost and then bitch when things don&#8217;t work day in and day out.  Just makes no sense.  I watched people today spend $12 on two large, 2 extra shot mochas from a local coffee shop, and you guys are expecting world class uptime for $8/month?  Get real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2006/12/14/networking-issues-resolved/#comment-6665</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2006/12/14/networking-issues-resolved/#comment-6665</guid>
		<description>dvg Says: 

December 15th, 2006 at 12:32 pm 
Stupid HTML-stripping.

LOOSE == NOT TIGHT

LOSE == MISPLACE, DECREASE

LOSING IS A WORD.

LOOSING IS *NOT* A WORD. 

I'm always amazed when people who use an International programme through the wonders of technology, suddenly present themselves, with such ignorance to the rest of the world. Checking someone else's spelling, on an open forum, has to be the worst form, epecially when there own lack of punctuation is so poor.
Perhaps snewp should have posted in his own native language and left you to decipher his comments for yourself, instead he chose to share in our native language, showing just how enept we in the western world truly are. 'We' have an expectation of others to adopt 'our' language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dvg Says: </p>
<p>December 15th, 2006 at 12:32 pm<br />
Stupid HTML-stripping.</p>
<p>LOOSE == NOT TIGHT</p>
<p>LOSE == MISPLACE, DECREASE</p>
<p>LOSING IS A WORD.</p>
<p>LOOSING IS *NOT* A WORD. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m always amazed when people who use an International programme through the wonders of technology, suddenly present themselves, with such ignorance to the rest of the world. Checking someone else&#8217;s spelling, on an open forum, has to be the worst form, epecially when there own lack of punctuation is so poor.<br />
Perhaps snewp should have posted in his own native language and left you to decipher his comments for yourself, instead he chose to share in our native language, showing just how enept we in the western world truly are. &#8216;We&#8217; have an expectation of others to adopt &#8216;our&#8217; language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Disbelief</title>
		<link>http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2006/12/14/networking-issues-resolved/#comment-6663</link>
		<dc:creator>In Disbelief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2006/12/14/networking-issues-resolved/#comment-6663</guid>
		<description>Amazing to read these horror stories, then note in the blog right next to this one that Dreamhost personnel are off partying (last night) while their customers are left screwed, high and dry.  Those of you who are leaving Dreamhost because you can't have your businesses strangled to death or screwed over any further, I hope you'll return with a final comment here, and let the rest of us know where you've chosen to relocate and why.  I'll be interested in seeing what Mike Davidson (www.mikeindustries.com) winds up writing.  He already withdrew his recommendation of Dreamhost for quite a while earlier this year, and had only recently reinstated it.  I know a lot of people listen to what Mike has to say (as the founder of NewsVine, this guy has serious credibility and a very broad following).  If Mike ever were to leave Dreamhost and write up a full explanation why, I suspect there would be a very large exodus of Dreamhost customers.  Dreamhost, if you're reading this, surely you must know that you've got to make a major course change here, not just a minor adjustment, and that you're badly in need of a fall-on-the-sword, full and unconditional mea culpa.  Surely you must know this is not sustainable and that you WILL wind up blowing up your business if you don't change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing to read these horror stories, then note in the blog right next to this one that Dreamhost personnel are off partying (last night) while their customers are left screwed, high and dry.  Those of you who are leaving Dreamhost because you can&#8217;t have your businesses strangled to death or screwed over any further, I hope you&#8217;ll return with a final comment here, and let the rest of us know where you&#8217;ve chosen to relocate and why.  I&#8217;ll be interested in seeing what Mike Davidson (www.mikeindustries.com) winds up writing.  He already withdrew his recommendation of Dreamhost for quite a while earlier this year, and had only recently reinstated it.  I know a lot of people listen to what Mike has to say (as the founder of NewsVine, this guy has serious credibility and a very broad following).  If Mike ever were to leave Dreamhost and write up a full explanation why, I suspect there would be a very large exodus of Dreamhost customers.  Dreamhost, if you&#8217;re reading this, surely you must know that you&#8217;ve got to make a major course change here, not just a minor adjustment, and that you&#8217;re badly in need of a fall-on-the-sword, full and unconditional mea culpa.  Surely you must know this is not sustainable and that you WILL wind up blowing up your business if you don&#8217;t change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2006/12/14/networking-issues-resolved/#comment-6656</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2006/12/14/networking-issues-resolved/#comment-6656</guid>
		<description>Andy, I feel your pain.

I'm getting the same BS from Dreamhost you are. I have a terribly slow website. It's been fine for months until this weekend.. now it's been awful for 72 hours.

Dreamhost has claimed everything is "FINE" 4 times now.. and it's clearly not.. anyone who took 1 minute to check the fix would have been the connection is awful, terribly slow.

My advertisers are up in arms.

I have one piece of advise to anyone reading this. BE CAREFUL.

Dreamhost so far has not resolved the problem, and has been literally terrible about responding. There are 600+ open support tickets.

Let's see how they respond to this today. I'm going to file a comprehensive BBB report if they do not resolve this morning.

-James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy, I feel your pain.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m getting the same BS from Dreamhost you are. I have a terribly slow website. It&#8217;s been fine for months until this weekend.. now it&#8217;s been awful for 72 hours.</p>
<p>Dreamhost has claimed everything is &#8220;FINE&#8221; 4 times now.. and it&#8217;s clearly not.. anyone who took 1 minute to check the fix would have been the connection is awful, terribly slow.</p>
<p>My advertisers are up in arms.</p>
<p>I have one piece of advise to anyone reading this. BE CAREFUL.</p>
<p>Dreamhost so far has not resolved the problem, and has been literally terrible about responding. There are 600+ open support tickets.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see how they respond to this today. I&#8217;m going to file a comprehensive BBB report if they do not resolve this morning.</p>
<p>-James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2006/12/14/networking-issues-resolved/#comment-6652</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2006/12/14/networking-issues-resolved/#comment-6652</guid>
		<description>hmmm.. well until I found the time to read these posts, I felt issolated in my whoa. It doesn't make me feel better knowing so many are suffering the same, just more frustrated that the 'support' are BSing so many people.

I have been told on numerous occasions, 'all is fine here, must be your end' or such as 'it must be your html coding that has changed' or 'we have checked the link to your test page, and it all runs fine from here, maybe you need to reduce your images so they download faster'. Well according to my bandwidth checker, the 1.5tb bandwidth is either being shared with the entire population of India, or they have swapped their connection to the server, with an old fax modem!

All this sort of BS does, is create wrath and frustration, subsequently more and more 'ticked emails' to the support centre. My business activites, like many posted here, rely on a paid for service. Irrespective of how much you pay, there should not automatically be an opinion 'you get what you pay for', unless its totally free. The advertisement in my contract states 99.9% uptime, I assumed that useable uptime, not simply a dribbling tap connection for the past 3 days!

I have several hosting servers all mirrored with the same files, so can 'although time consuming' swap the url access to keep my business going to some extent. Beleive it or not, some are cheaper than Dreamhost and have been running flawlessly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm.. well until I found the time to read these posts, I felt issolated in my whoa. It doesn&#8217;t make me feel better knowing so many are suffering the same, just more frustrated that the &#8217;support&#8217; are BSing so many people.</p>
<p>I have been told on numerous occasions, &#8216;all is fine here, must be your end&#8217; or such as &#8216;it must be your html coding that has changed&#8217; or &#8216;we have checked the link to your test page, and it all runs fine from here, maybe you need to reduce your images so they download faster&#8217;. Well according to my bandwidth checker, the 1.5tb bandwidth is either being shared with the entire population of India, or they have swapped their connection to the server, with an old fax modem!</p>
<p>All this sort of BS does, is create wrath and frustration, subsequently more and more &#8216;ticked emails&#8217; to the support centre. My business activites, like many posted here, rely on a paid for service. Irrespective of how much you pay, there should not automatically be an opinion &#8216;you get what you pay for&#8217;, unless its totally free. The advertisement in my contract states 99.9% uptime, I assumed that useable uptime, not simply a dribbling tap connection for the past 3 days!</p>
<p>I have several hosting servers all mirrored with the same files, so can &#8216;although time consuming&#8217; swap the url access to keep my business going to some extent. Beleive it or not, some are cheaper than Dreamhost and have been running flawlessly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dodig</title>
		<link>http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2006/12/14/networking-issues-resolved/#comment-6547</link>
		<dc:creator>Dodig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2006/12/14/networking-issues-resolved/#comment-6547</guid>
		<description>Of course it does have to do everything with your domain. It expired.

   Domain Name: PSYCROTIC.COM
   Registrar: IN2NET NETWORK, INC.
   Whois Server: whois.in2net.com
   Referral URL: http://www.in2net.com
   Name Server: NS3.DREAMHOST.COM
   Name Server: NS2.DREAMHOST.COM
   Name Server: NS1.DREAMHOST.COM
   RRP Status: REDEMPTIONPERIOD
   Status: redemptionPeriod
   Updated Date: 15-Dec-2006
   Creation Date: 04-Nov-2005
   Expiration Date: 04-Nov-2006</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course it does have to do everything with your domain. It expired.</p>
<p>   Domain Name: PSYCROTIC.COM<br />
   Registrar: IN2NET NETWORK, INC.<br />
   Whois Server: whois.in2net.com<br />
   Referral URL: <a href="http://www.in2net.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.in2net.com</a><br />
   Name Server: NS3.DREAMHOST.COM<br />
   Name Server: NS2.DREAMHOST.COM<br />
   Name Server: NS1.DREAMHOST.COM<br />
   RRP Status: REDEMPTIONPERIOD<br />
   Status: redemptionPeriod<br />
   Updated Date: 15-Dec-2006<br />
   Creation Date: 04-Nov-2005<br />
   Expiration Date: 04-Nov-2006</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrik</title>
		<link>http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2006/12/14/networking-issues-resolved/#comment-6537</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2006/12/14/networking-issues-resolved/#comment-6537</guid>
		<description>Check your settings - you may have lost your DNS somehow. 

http://dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=www.psycrotic.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check your settings - you may have lost your DNS somehow. </p>
<p><a href="http://dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=www.psycrotic.com" rel="nofollow">http://dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=www.psycrotic.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jathavan</title>
		<link>http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2006/12/14/networking-issues-resolved/#comment-6534</link>
		<dc:creator>Jathavan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 07:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2006/12/14/networking-issues-resolved/#comment-6534</guid>
		<description>Server not found

      

      
      
      

      
        
        

          

Firefox can't find the server at www.psycrotic.com.

        


        
        


    *   Check the address for typing errors such as
          ww.example.com instead of
          www.example.com

    *   If you are unable to load any pages, check your computer's network
          connection.

    *   If your computer or network is protected by a firewall or proxy, make sure
          that Firefox is permitted to access the Web.

Is what I'm getting for my domain www.psycrotic.com (It also has nothing to do with my domain registration since my domain holder has promised to keep it for a few days).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Server not found</p>
<p>Firefox can&#8217;t find the server at <a href="http://www.psycrotic.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.psycrotic.com</a>.</p>
<p>    *   Check the address for typing errors such as<br />
          ww.example.com instead of<br />
          <a href="http://www.example.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.example.com</a></p>
<p>    *   If you are unable to load any pages, check your computer&#8217;s network<br />
          connection.</p>
<p>    *   If your computer or network is protected by a firewall or proxy, make sure<br />
          that Firefox is permitted to access the Web.</p>
<p>Is what I&#8217;m getting for my domain <a href="http://www.psycrotic.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.psycrotic.com</a> (It also has nothing to do with my domain registration since my domain holder has promised to keep it for a few days).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brenthegeek</title>
		<link>http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2006/12/14/networking-issues-resolved/#comment-6526</link>
		<dc:creator>brenthegeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 01:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2006/12/14/networking-issues-resolved/#comment-6526</guid>
		<description>Acts of god happen all the time (some places more then others), but I have had no problems with pellegrino at all...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Acts of god happen all the time (some places more then others), but I have had no problems with pellegrino at all&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
